Sunday, June 28, 2009

Concatenation -- The Chain Gang

During a recent catching-up-on-our-lives chat, my college friend Claressa reminded me once again why I've always admired her. Talking about her lab work or new beekeeping hobby -- can't remember which -- she employed the term concatenation. There was no particular motive: She wasn't aiming to be formal or ironic or anything else. We were casually chatting. She just knows such words and employs them as breezily as others use the or going. (And before you go thinking she's just some prissy vocabulary geek, let me note that this is a woman who introduced me to Sid & Nancy, who cultures Legionella bacteria, and who displays on her mantel a black velvet painting of Yoda that she got as a gift from a Hell's Angel.)

Concatenation has been stuck in my head since I started this blog with my hubby's encouragement. Among the helpful tools he bought to noodge me into the blogosphere was a copy of The Lexicon, a compendium of words collected from the writings of wordsmith William F. Buckley Jr. Flipping through this pocket-sized tome, one of the first words I landed on was concatenation. As Mr. Buckley knew, the word means "a series or order of things depending on each other as if linked together," or, in the most basic sense, "a chain of events." It's not a term I happened to have had at the ready in my vocabulary bag of tricks at the time. Nor is it one I've had opportunity to employ since then. So my ears pricked up and I had to smile a little when concatenation tripped off Claressa's tongue. Ah, there it is! If I can't get around to using it, I'm glad someone else could.

Dictionary Definition:
Roots: Latin catēnāre, "to bind," from Latin catēna, meaning "chain"
Pronounced: [kon-kat-n-ay-shuhn]
1. union by chaining or linking together
2. union in a series or chain, of whihc he things united form as it were links
3. an interdependent or unbroken sequence

Saturday, June 6, 2009

Lachrymal -- Up to Here in Tears

Ok, call me a softie, a bleeding heart, whatever, but sure enough, three-quarters of the way through the opening sequence of Pixar's new movie Up, my lip was quivering and the moisture gathering on the edges of my lower eyelids threatened to trickle down my cheeks in the image of the waterfall depicted on-screen. And this is a cartoon, for Pete's sake! What gives with this lachrymal impulse?

Up isn't the first movie to get me teary-eyed and won't be the last, I'm sure. Earlier in our marriage, when Mark was traveling a fair bit, I learned the hard way that revisiting The Sixth Sense when he was away on a business trip wasn't perhaps the best cinematic option to watch solo. The penultimate scene, when Bruce Willis's character realizes the truth of what's happened, had me looking like a cross between a racoon and W.C. Fields, what with my smeared mascara and rubbed-red nose.

Of course, these cinematic scenes strive to be lachrymorose, to jerk those tears right out of our lachrymal ducts. And also, of course, some efforts work better than others and what elicits sniffles from one person as easily evokes snickers from others. But I expect that for just about everyone, there's a scene or song or some other surrogate that has elicited that lachrymal reflex.

So how does this happen? How can a bit of what's so clearly fiction incite this kind of emotional response? The ancient Greeks understood the power of fiction to hold a mirror up to life and to purge oneself emotionally through the experience of catharsis, a term originally meaning "cleansing" and "purification."

But why do we respond with such real emotion to something that we know is, well, not real? Empathy. I can watch Carl's life with Ellie unfold onscreen in Up and relate to these cartoon characters' all too believable experiences. I can see Bruce Willis's character's emotion as he watches the video of his wedding and feel the emotions of my own wedding. Doesn't matter if their fictional experiences are not mirror images of my own; the emotions are the same.

This is the boon of consciousness, the ability to relate to the experiences of others -- even strangers -- because in them we can recognize ourselves. It's both selfish and altruistic at the same time.

So I don't apologize for my lachrymal response to Up. Those tears are part of what makes me human. The trick to being fully human, however, is to be as equally open to the real scenes and emotions around me in the offscreen, mundane world and to be as equally emotionally responsive to them and not jaded or flummoxed into inaction. That's harder than when you're sitting in a theater or movie seat and the lights come back up. A curtain will not magically fall over the hurts, the hunger, the loneliness of the real people around me. Catharsis and tears may be about purging, but it doesn't hurt if they provide a solid kick in the conscience, either.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Acidulent -- Sour Grapes

Acidulent tripped me up on FreeRice.com tonight and prevented me from donating 450 grains straight without missing a term. If you've never tried FreeRice, give it a whirl. It's a vocabulary building quiz AND hunger-assuaging program all in one site. The site donates 10 grains of rice to the UN World Food Program for every vocabulary word you get right on its quiz.

FreeRice is based on the principle of synonyms. Space on the site is limited as is people's time. Who wants to read long, detailed dictionary definitions while playing a quick game between attempts to finish the document you need to turn in already, because, after all, it's good to stimulate your brain's thinking capacity and get the juices flowing when writer's block has derailed your ability to finish that draft you're already past deadline turning in, right? On FreeRice, you select from four possible synonyms (or an occasional phrase like "strip blubber from") for the word you're given.

Synonyms are useful, but sometimes seem lacking. For example, I recognized that the correct choice for capricious out of the four options given was whimsical. But I think of capricious as meaning "fickle" or "volatile" more so than "whimsical." Still, someone will get some rice for that right answer on the quiz.

But acidulent got me. My choices were "inharmonious," "frisky," "sour" and "temporary." "Sour," I should've concluded, made the most sense given that citric acid is a puckering substance. But I second-guessed myself and bet my grains on "frisky." Doh! Darn my capricious gut instinct! Instead of free rice for a hungry person, I got sour grapes for my wrong answer. Oh well, the next word pops up straightaway, so you can make up for your mistakes and fill that rice bowl.

Dictionary Definition
Pronounced: [uh-sij-uh-luhnt]
Also, acidulous
Root: Latin acidus meaning "sour"
1. slightly sour
2. sharp; caustic: the movie critic's acidulent tone